How addictive is Seroxat?


You might think that after all the years of doctors and patients all around the world saying Seroxat is highly addictive – oops, sorry, causes dependence and severe withdrawal reactions – that Glaxo would simply undertake the definitive study to prove us all wrong and to show the world once and for all really how safe and non-addictive Seroxat is…

Well, the truth is Glaxo could have done this years ago but it has not. Why? I leave that simple question to you to answer.

In fact, the official Paxil prescribing information (produced by Glaxo, current version) confirms this by saying:

Controlled Substance Class: PAXIL is not a controlled substance.
Physical and Psychologic Dependence: PAXIL has not been systematically studied in animals or humans for its potential for abuse, tolerance or physical dependence…

Again, I ask Glaxo why have no systematic studies been done? Why not put an end to all the stories about ‘poop out’ (tolerance) and withdrawal nightmares and prove once and for all what it says is true and we are wrong?

Or maybe, just maybe Glaxo isn’t telling us the whole truth…

The following exchange is from a transcript of a video deposition taken from Dr. David Wheadon, who was at the time, Vice President Regulatory Affairs and Product Professional Services, GlaxoSmithKline, in Philadelphia, PA on Thursday, October 19, 2000 prior to the Tobin/Schell civil suit.

Questioning Dr. Wheadon were California attorney Donald J. Farber and Texas attorney Andy Vickery.

Paxil Victim’s Attorney: I’m asking you to kind of elevate yourself above this particular paper and go to your general knowledge now on Paxil. You have been now with the company eight years, and you have studied and are aware, I presume, of Paxil’s traits in either causing or unrelated to addiction and withdrawal, and based on that general knowledge I think you probably have, do you consider as a labeling instruction today that this paragraph, physical and psychological dependence, is a good labeling instruction?

GlaxoSmithKline’s Dr. Wheadon: Well, quite frankly, it is an outdated labeling instruction, because there have been a number of systematic studies in humans looking at the potential for Paxil for abuse, tolerance and physical dependence. So actually, there is data to date to negate the statement that it has not been systematically studied, because, in fact, it has been.

I’m getting confused now – under oath, Dr Wheadon clearly stated Paxil (Seroxat) has been studied a number of times in humans looking at the potential for Paxil for abuse, tolerance and physical dependence…

Hang on though, the current, official Paxil prescribing information says that:

…PAXIL has not been systematically studied in animals or humans for its potential for abuse, tolerance or physical dependence…

So while Wheadon said one thing (under oath) in 2000, Glaxo says the EXACT OPPOSITE in its current official prescribing information.

The question remains – how addictive is Seroxat?

Who knows the answer – Glaxo or David Wheadon?

One thing is for sure, the public aren’t being told the truth…


8 Responses to “How addictive is Seroxat?”

  1. Matthew Holford Says:

    Don’t worry, now you’ve publicized this, the MHRA will leap into action and investigate the possibility that GSK has withheld further trials data. Because withholding trials data is a criminal offence, you know, and given its position as an executive arm of government, there’s no doubt that the MHRA will be determined to ensure that the Law is observed, and where transgressed, upheld.


  2. admin Says:

    And there I was, getting all upset about this. I forgot we have the MHRA to protect us.

    Thanks for reminding me.

  3. Matthew Holford Says:

    No worries. Where relevant, I’m always keen to point out the excellence of our public bodies!


  4. truthman30 Says:

    GSK have no interest in the truth …

    This seem to me to be a slip up on the part of Mr Wheaton..

    Of course GSK has done these studoes and has information on dependence and addiction , but it would never release these to the public..

  5. Matthew Holford Says:

    Not true, Truthman: from what I’ve seen, it’s interested in establishing the truth, so that it can cover it up, if necessary. One can’t hide something, if one doesn’t understand the significance of it, first! Actually, that’s not true, one could engage in complete silence, to avoid letting something slip, but GSK wouldn’t do that, would it?


  6. truthman30 Says:

    Seroxat is addictive enough to have a withdrawal more disabling and horrific than heroin could ever be …

    I call it a “Hypnotic Narcotic”…

    Check out Seroxats’ Hypnotic-Narcotic properties here :

  7. admin Says:

    Reblogged this on seroxat secrets… and commented:

    All this talk about Seroxat addiction and withdrawal reminded me of an post that I wrote back in 2007… I think it would be very interesting to see the data from the studies that Dr Wheadon spoke about while under oath in California.

    Especially given what we now know about the lies GSK told about Study 329.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: