Glaxo staff decide not to co-operate with the MHRA’s criminal investigation

A very interesting answer to a Freedom of information request from Bob Fiddaman.

In the recent 4 year long investigation into Glaxo by the MHRA (the probe began after disclosure that Glaxo withheld data from Seroxat clinical trials), it was announced by the MHRA that Glaxo and individual Glaxo employees declined “invitations to attend interviews… but did provide three written witness statements – two on behalf of the drugmaker and one on behalf of an unnamed employee.

One of the questions Bob asked was this:

“Why were MHRA enforcement investigators unable to question GSK staff?”

The MHRA replied to him:

Under UK criminal law suspects in criminal investigations can not be compelled to answer questions, they have a right to remain silent. Lengthy negotiations were conducted with solicitors acting for individual members of GSK staff and for GSK itself with a view to persuading them to attend interviews under caution. The conclusion of the correspondence was that all the potential interviewees indicated that they would not attend an interview under caution.

The individual suspects (as opposed to the corporate entity GSK) could have been arrested and required to attend an interview under caution. However they could still not be compelled to answer questions and, given that their solicitors had clearly indicated that they would not answer questions, the investigation team concluded that there was nothing to gain by carrying out arrests.

So there you have it, in black and white. Glaxo employees simply decided not to co-operate with a criminal investigation into their actions and said they would not answer questions.

Good to know that Glaxo employees are serious about the safety profile of their drugs and are seen to be acting in best interests of us patients at all times.

I wonder why they decided not to co-operate?

I wonder who they are?

5 Responses to “Glaxo staff decide not to co-operate with the MHRA’s criminal investigation”

  1. BOB FIDDAMAN Says:

    I’ve asked them a further 2 questions on the back of their answers to me.

    1. Whom were the suspects you refer to in the email you sent me (RE: FOI Request 08/091) on 08 April 2008 10:55?

    2. Was either Dr Ian Hudson or Sir Alasdair Breckenridge interviewed by the MHRA Enforcement Officers?
    a, Were they questioned under caution?
    b, Did they decline to be interviewed under caution?
    c, If they wasn’t interviewed, could you please tell me why?

    http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2008/04/new-mhra-foi-request.html

  2. MHRA staff co-operate with Glaxo to monitor the internet.. « seroxat secrets… Says:

    […] Glaxo staff decide not to co-operate with the MHRA’s criminal investigation […]

  3. MHRA staff co-operate with Glaxo to monitor the internet.. « seroxat secrets… Says:

    […] Glaxo staff decide not to co-operate with the MHRA’s criminal investigation […]

  4. Seroxat: What This Blog Is About… | GSK : Licence To (K) ill Says:

    […] For more on this subject please look here and here. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: